The Dark Side of Being Real Online: Who Is @LifeofPujaa And What’s The Controversy?

@LifeofPujaa - Pujarini Pradhan is a social media influencer who gained significant internet attention for sharing her village lifestyle. She often speaks about literature, her love for cinema, books, and feminism in fluent English. However, in recent days, her social media profile has come under scrutiny, with the internet becoming “terrified” of her simply because she appeared “too real and authentic.” She has also been accused of being an “industry plant.”Who is ‘@LifeofPujaa’?@LifeofPujaa is the Instagram handle of Pujarini Pradhan, a content creator based in a rural village in West Bengal. With over 7 lakh followers, she has built a niche audience by sharing glimpses of her everyday life, often blending conversations around literature, cinema, feminism,

and personal reflections.What sets her apart is her raw, unfiltered style. Unlike the polished, highly curated aesthetic that dominates Instagram, her videos are shot in a modest home setting, where books, utensils, and daily life coexist naturally. Her fluency in English and discussions on intellectual topics, despite her rural backdrop, initially drew admiration and curiosity from viewers.What sparked the controversy?In recent days, however, that same uniqueness has come under scrutiny. Several influencers and commentators began questioning whether her online persona was entirely genuine. Among them was Niharika Jain, who, along with others, pointed out perceived inconsistencies between her content and older visuals.Critics speculated that her image might be strategically crafted, suggesting she could be “managed” or scripted. Some went as far as to label her an “industry plant” or a “social media construct,” implying that her content was deliberately designed to appear rooted in rural simplicity while being backed by professional support.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Times Now (@timesnow)

Pujarini responds to allegationsResponding directly to the criticism, Pujarini dismissed these claims and clarified her journey. She maintained that while she has worked with agencies, her creative process has largely been independent.She said in the video she uploaded on Instagram, “The first agency I worked with was in November. That agency never helped me shoot or edit my videos, that was all me.'' She revealed that she eventually cut ties with her first agency after discovering financial discrepancies.She said, “I was getting scammed. On 19th January, I pushed out a Reel saying I was doing everything alone, because that was the truth.” She added that joining a new agency later helped stabilise her income.“On 27th January, I started working with another agency, which is my current agency. My brand deals became consistent after I signed up with this agency. Before this, I never knew that money could come in so consistently in this field,” Pujarini added.Pujarini emphasised that her current agency only handles brand collaborations, while she continues to independently shoot and edit her videos. Addressing the criticism around her lifestyle and productivity, she said, “They questioned my consistency and time management, even though I have already talked about my supportive mother-in-law who cooks during the day, and my husband who cooks at night. “They say I am not authentic, but I don’t know how to pretend to be authentic.”She also responded to remarks about her possessions and skills, “They judged me for having hardcover books, even though everyone knows I have an Amazon wishlist in my bio, and I often share stories of people gifting me books.'' “They laughed at me for learning things like colour grading. Like it’s hard? Anyone can do it. They called me an industry plant. I did not know what an industry plant is until I started researching about it,'' added Pujarini. A broader debate on authenticityIn her closing remarks, Pujarini suggested that the backlash intensified when she began expressing stronger opinions.“They were fine until I started giving my opinions on feminism and politics. They want to see suffering in every video. They want me to complain about life. They want to see sadness,” she said.“But the moment I started making money from my videos, when I started giving liberal opinions, then they felt like I’m a danger, and they started making conspiracy theories.”Framing the situation as part of a larger issue, she argued that creators from modest backgrounds are often expected to fit a certain narrative. According to her, the criticism reflects discomfort with individuals who challenge those expectations while achieving visibility and success.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Pujarini Pradhan (@lifeofpujaa)

Support Pours InDespite the criticism, Pujarini has received significant support online. As her follower count continues to grow, several well-known personalities and influencers have spoken out in her favour, backing her authenticity and creative voice.Among them, Kusha Kapila publicly extended her support, writing, "I am always a call away, Puja. (some) agencies around here act too smart but you are already smarter than them. You are one of the most exciting creators of this year so kuch toh log kahengey. Soldier on. You brought me back to reading and thank you for that."The episode has now evolved into a larger conversation about authenticity in the digital age, raising questions about who gets to define “realness” online, and why it often comes under suspicion.