‘Aadalat Batayegi Kya Sahi Aur Kya Galat’: Kamaal R. Khan Reacts To Arrest In Firing Incident

Actor and self-proclaimed critic Kamaal R. Khan, who was arrested in connection with a firing incident that occurred on January 18, 2026, in the Oshiwara area of Andheri, was later granted bail on a personal

bond of Rs 25,000. Now, following his bail, Khan has given a statement and stated that he has had a gun license for 22 years.

Speaking to ANI, Kamaal R. Khan shared, “Zahir si baat hai ki kuch aisi cheezen hui hongi, police ko doubt aaya hoga, aur uski wajah se yeh sab hua hai. Lekin kaun galat aur kaun sahi hai, woh main nahi keh sakta. Aadalat batayegi ki kya sahi hai aur kya galat… (It is obvious that some things must have happened, the police must have had doubts, and because of that, all this has happened. But who is wrong and who is right, I cannot say. The court will decide what is right and what is wrong.)”

Further, he stated, “Mera kehna yeh hai ki mere paas license hai, 22 saal se hai, aur aaj tak maine law nahi toda, koi foul play nahi kiya. 22 saal ke baad kyun karunga? Lekin theek hai, police ne apni duty ki hai, case banaya hai, correct hai. Woh aadalat decide karegi ki kya sahi aur kya galat. (What I’m saying is that I have had a license for 22 years, and till now I have never broken the law or done any foul play. Why would I do it after 22 years? But it’s okay, the police have done their duty and filed a case, which is correct. The court will decide what is right and what is wrong.)”

About KRK’s Bail

During questioning at the Oshiwara police station, KRK admitted to discharging the firearm, a licensed weapon registered in his name, and said he fired the shots while cleaning and testing the gun, aiming at a nearby mangrove area, but that strong winds caused the bullets to deviate and hit the building.

Meanwhile, his lawyer, Sana Raees Khan, argued that the arrest was illegal as mandatory notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, was never served upon the Applicant prior to the arrest.

She stated that the Applicant was never informed, either orally or in writing, of the specific grounds for the arrest, in violation of Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India and Section 47 BNSS, thereby rendering the entire arrest invalid.