The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, in its order on November 28, disposed of the application filed by Chronos seeking enforcement of the ₹1,080 crore bid to acquire the IL&FS Financial Centre at BKC.
The tribunal also upheld IL&FS’s contractual right to revise the transaction consideration.
In its order, the tribunal held that the Letter of Intent (LoI) dated March 21, 2022, constitutes a concluded and binding contract between IL&FS and Chronos.
However, the LoI contains clauses which grant IL&FS a unilateral right to amend, modify or supplement the LoI, including financial terms, under the court-approved resolution framework, the order added.
Also Read: Jyotiraditya Scindia targets five-year turnaround: India Post to become profit centre, eyes quick-commerce push
The tribunal also ruled that the IL&FS letter dated August 16, 2024, which enhanced the consideration from ₹1,080 crore to ₹1,481 crore, is valid and cannot be quashed.
The NCLT further noted that IL&FS had submitted fresh valuation reports indicating an average fair-market value of approximately ₹1,722 crore for the property, and that revising the transaction value aligns with the value-maximisation objective mandated under the resolution process.
On the performance guarantee, the tribunal said that no disqualification arises immediately because IL&FS had not prescribed a renewal timeline and Chronos had signalled its willingness to deposit the guarantee with the NCLT.
The tribunal directed Chronos to tender the performance guarantee (demand drafts aggregating to 10% of the bid) to the tribunal within 30 days, failing which disqualification under the RFP (Request for Proposal) terms shall arise.
Earlier on June 26, IL&FS had approached the NCLT to scrap Chronos’s ₹1,080 crore bid for its flagship BKC property.
In its petition, IL&FS had sought dismissal of the Brookfield-backed bid for its flagship BKC property, the IL&FS Financial Centre (TIFC), citing bidder disqualification and non-compliance with bidding conditions.
IL&FS had alleged that an affiliate of Brookfield Chronos Properties (CPPL) was required to maintain a performance guarantee until the execution of definitive agreements.
The company had emphasised that 'value maximisation' is an important tenet for the public interest board’s mandate under the court-supervised resolution process and approved resolution framework, and sought Brookfield to revise its offer in line with the updated valuation, as per the filing with the NCLT.
/images/ppid_59c68470-image-176459756394392787.webp)




/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-176457963812628484.webp)
/images/ppid_59c68470-image-176432256627688887.webp)


/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-176439556731680204.webp)

