What's Happening?
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has issued a directive requiring Pentagon personnel to obtain prior approval from the Department's legislative affairs office before engaging with Congress or state lawmakers.
This policy, outlined in a memo dated October 15, applies to military commanders, civilian leaders of military branches, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, among others. The directive aims to ensure that all legislative activities are centrally coordinated to align with the Department's priorities. The memo, which revives a 2006-era policy that had not been previously enforced, excludes the Pentagon Inspector General's office from these restrictions. The move is part of Hegseth's broader efforts to control information flow within the Pentagon, which has included limiting engagements with think tanks and external events.
Why It's Important?
The directive could significantly impact how the Pentagon communicates with Congress, potentially affecting legislative oversight and transparency. By centralizing communication, the Pentagon aims to prevent conflicting messages and ensure alignment with its legislative goals. However, this move has raised concerns among lawmakers and staffers who have already experienced limited engagement with Hegseth. Critics argue that the policy may stifle necessary communication between the Department and Congress, which is crucial for informed decision-making on defense matters. The policy reflects a broader trend of administrations seeking to control interactions with Congress, but its implementation could face logistical challenges given the volume of engagements the Pentagon conducts monthly.
What's Next?
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs, Dane Hughes, will lead a review of congressional affairs activities to streamline processes and address current issues. A working group will be convened to participate in this review, with senior leaders and combatant commanders expected to contribute. The outcome of this review could lead to adjustments in how the Pentagon manages its legislative interactions, potentially easing some of the restrictions if deemed necessary. Meanwhile, the policy's impact on Pentagon-Congress relations will be closely monitored by both defense officials and lawmakers.
