What's Happening?
The Trump administration has proposed a new rule that would require citizens from visa-exempt countries, including Australia and New Zealand, to disclose up to five years of social media history when applying for entry into the United States through the Electronic
System for Travel Authorization (ESTA). This proposal, published in the U.S. Federal Register, aims to align ESTA requirements with those of tourist visa applications, which have mandated social media disclosure since 2019. The rule would also require applicants to provide additional information such as phone numbers from the past five years, email addresses from the past decade, family member details, and biometric data. The proposal is currently open for a 60-day public comment period, set to close in early January.
Why It's Important?
This proposed change is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to tighten U.S. immigration and entry controls. By expanding social media vetting to ESTA applicants, the administration seeks to enhance security measures and scrutinize potential visitors more thoroughly. However, this move has raised concerns among legal and policy experts about potential implications for online privacy and freedom of expression. Additionally, travel industry observers are worried about the impact of these measures on international travel, especially with major events like the 2026 FIFA World Cup approaching, which the U.S. will co-host with Mexico and Canada. The requirement could deter travelers from visiting the U.S., affecting tourism and related industries.
What's Next?
The proposal is currently in a public comment phase, allowing stakeholders and the general public to express their views and concerns. Depending on the feedback received, the administration may adjust the proposal before finalizing it. If implemented, the new rule could face legal challenges from privacy advocates and civil liberties organizations, potentially delaying its enforcement. The travel industry may also lobby against the proposal, citing potential negative impacts on tourism and international relations. The outcome of this proposal will likely influence future U.S. immigration policies and entry requirements.
