What's Happening?
Bret Stephens, a columnist for The New York Times and editor-in-chief of Sapir, delivered the 46th annual State of World Jewry address at the 92NY in Manhattan. During his speech, Stephens criticized the current strategies employed by Jewish organizations
in combating antisemitism, describing them as a 'mostly wasted effort.' He argued that the significant financial resources allocated to these efforts could be better spent on initiatives that strengthen Jewish identity, such as building more Jewish day schools. Stephens suggested dismantling major Jewish institutions like the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Federations of North America, advocating instead for a focus on Jewish education and identity-building programs. He emphasized the need for American Jews to embrace their Jewishness and be proud of Israel, moving away from what he described as a 'perpetual apology machine.'
Why It's Important?
Stephens' remarks highlight a critical debate within the Jewish community about the most effective ways to address antisemitism and support Jewish identity. His call to redirect resources from traditional antisemitism combat strategies to identity-building initiatives could influence the priorities of Jewish philanthropic organizations. This shift could impact how Jewish communities allocate their resources, potentially leading to increased investment in educational programs and cultural initiatives. The discussion also touches on broader themes of identity and pride within minority communities, raising questions about the balance between external advocacy and internal community strengthening.
What's Next?
If Stephens' suggestions gain traction, Jewish organizations may begin to reevaluate their funding strategies, potentially leading to a reallocation of resources towards educational and identity-focused programs. This could involve increased support for Jewish day schools and summer camps, as well as initiatives aimed at fostering a stronger sense of Jewish identity among younger generations. The response from major Jewish institutions and leaders will be crucial in determining whether these ideas lead to significant changes in policy and practice. Additionally, the broader Jewish community's reaction to Stephens' critique could influence future discussions on how best to address antisemitism and support Jewish life in America.
