What's Happening?
An investigation by the University of Toronto's Citizen Lab has revealed that the Jordanian government used Cellebrite's phone-cracking technology to access the devices of activists and human rights defenders. This nonconsensual access, which occurred
between late 2023 and mid-2025, conflicts with international human rights treaties that Jordan has ratified. The investigation, conducted in coordination with the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, found that the devices of four activists were subjected to Cellebrite's forensic extraction products. The findings have prompted calls for Cellebrite to investigate its clients in Jordan. The report adds to existing concerns about the misuse of Cellebrite technology in various countries.
Why It's Important?
The use of Cellebrite technology by the Jordanian government against activists highlights the broader issue of digital surveillance and its implications for human rights. This case underscores the potential for technology to be used by authoritarian regimes to suppress dissent and monitor civil society. It raises questions about the ethical responsibilities of technology companies in ensuring their products are not used to violate human rights. The situation also reflects the challenges faced by activists in maintaining privacy and security in the digital age, potentially leading to increased self-censorship and a chilling effect on free expression.
What's Next?
Cellebrite may face increased scrutiny and pressure to ensure its technology is not misused by governments to infringe on human rights. The company has stated that it prohibits transactions with entities on sanctions lists and vets potential customers against human rights parameters. However, the effectiveness of these measures may be questioned, prompting calls for more robust oversight and accountability. The international community, including human rights organizations, may push for stronger regulations governing the sale and use of surveillance technology. This case could also lead to broader discussions about the role of technology companies in safeguarding human rights.
