What's Happening?
Adur and Worthing Councils have reversed a decision to award £165,000 to a consultancy firm located over 250 miles away in the north of England. The initial decision faced opposition from Worthing Community Independents and Green Party councillors, who
raised concerns about the allocation of funds meant for local community groups. The councillors argued that the firm had no record of supporting charities and lacked understanding of the local area. The decision was scrutinized by the council's Joint Overview and Scrutiny Committee, which highlighted substantial financial risks and a breach of the Labour council's manifesto commitment to support local economic development. As a result, the funding will now be redirected to a grant program supporting local charities in neighborhoods with the greatest need.
Why It's Important?
The reversal of the funding decision underscores the importance of local governance in ensuring that public funds are used effectively to support community needs. By redirecting the £165,000 to local charities, the councils aim to bolster the voluntary and community sector, which plays a crucial role in providing essential services and support to residents. This move is expected to strengthen local economic development and enhance community resilience. The decision also highlights the role of scrutiny committees in holding decision-makers accountable and ensuring transparency in public spending.
What's Next?
Adur and Worthing Councils plan to launch a new grant program in November, aimed at supporting local groups and organizations. The program will be designed to be simple, flexible, and focused on current community needs. Local groups are invited to participate in shaping the grant at a workshop scheduled for October 24 at The Shoreham Centre. This initiative is expected to foster collaboration between the councils and community stakeholders, ensuring that the funding has a maximum impact on local development.
Beyond the Headlines
The decision to reverse the funding allocation may have broader implications for how local governments approach procurement and support for community sectors. It raises questions about the criteria used to select external consultants and the importance of prioritizing local expertise and involvement. This case could serve as a precedent for other councils facing similar decisions, emphasizing the need for thorough scrutiny and community engagement in public spending.
