What's Happening?
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has mandated a return to Times New Roman as the default typeface for the State Department, reversing the previous administration's choice of Calibri. Rubio argues that consistent formatting enhances credibility and supports
a unified department identity. This decision has sparked criticism, with some viewing it as a regressive move that undermines accessibility and modern design principles. The change has been described as both 'sad and hilarious' by Calibri's designer, Lucas de Groot, and is seen as part of a broader effort by the administration to revert to traditional practices.
Why It's Important?
The decision to revert to Times New Roman has broader implications for government communication and accessibility. Typeface choices can impact readability, especially for digital content, and the move away from a more accessible font like Calibri may affect how information is consumed by the public. This change also reflects the administration's approach to branding and identity, potentially signaling a preference for traditionalism over modernization. The debate highlights the importance of design choices in public policy and their impact on inclusivity and accessibility.
Beyond the Headlines
The choice of typeface is more than a design preference; it carries cultural and historical significance. Times New Roman, once considered modern, is now seen as outdated by some, while Calibri represents a shift towards digital accessibility. This decision may also reflect broader political and cultural values, as it aligns with the administration's 'Make America Great Again' ethos. The move raises questions about the role of design in government and how it can influence public perception and engagement.
