What's Happening?
A behavioral consultant, Scott Ervin, has criticized traditional disciplinary methods in schools, particularly the practice of suspending students for violent threats. In a recent article, Ervin argues that such methods are outdated and ineffective, likening
them to 'Dark Ages thinking.' He suggests that schools should adopt more constructive approaches that involve students in resolving the problems they create. Ervin emphasizes the importance of teaching students responsibility and problem-solving skills, rather than relying solely on administrative actions like suspensions. He proposes that teachers should be empowered to take action and work with students to develop plans that address the harm caused by their behavior.
Why It's Important?
The discussion around school discipline is significant as it impacts student behavior, school safety, and educational outcomes. Traditional disciplinary actions, such as suspensions, may not address the root causes of behavioral issues and can lead to repeated offenses. By advocating for alternative methods, Ervin highlights the need for schools to focus on long-term behavioral change and student accountability. This approach could potentially reduce recidivism and improve the school environment by fostering a culture of responsibility and empathy among students. Additionally, empowering teachers to manage discipline could lead to more consistent and effective interventions.
