What's Happening?
An informal poll conducted at the Jewish Federations of North America's General Assembly revealed that a significant majority of attendees believe the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
is unrealistic. The poll was held before and after a debate between John Podhoretz, who argued against the viability of the two-state solution, and Michael Koplow, who supported it. Initially, 53% of participants felt the solution was unrealistic, but this increased to 67% after the debate. The poll reflects growing skepticism within the Jewish community about the feasibility of the two-state solution, despite its historical support among American Jewish institutions. The debate highlighted differing views on the solution's viability, with Podhoretz citing recent terror attacks and Palestinian hostility as barriers, while Koplow argued for its necessity to maintain Israel's democratic identity.
Why It's Important?
The results of this informal poll indicate a shift in perspective among Jewish federation professionals regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Historically, the two-state solution has been a cornerstone of American Jewish support for peace in the region. However, increasing skepticism could influence policy discussions and advocacy efforts within Jewish organizations. This change in sentiment may also impact U.S. foreign policy, as American Jewish institutions have traditionally played a role in shaping diplomatic approaches to the Middle East. The debate underscores the complexity of achieving peace and the challenges posed by recent geopolitical developments, including the October 7 terror attacks and evolving Arab-Israeli relations.
