What's Happening?
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to make a significant decision in the case of FS Credit Opportunities v. Saba Capital Master Fund. The case revolves around whether Section 47(b) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 provides a private right of action for investors seeking to rescind contracts with investment companies. This legal battle began when Saba Capital Master Fund, an activist investor, challenged the control share provisions adopted by a group of closed-end funds, including FS Credit Opportunities Corp. These provisions require that any investor acquiring 10% or more of the funds' shares must have their voting rights approved by two-thirds of existing shareholders. Saba argues that this violates the equal voting rights requirement of Section 18(i) of the ICA. The district court ruled in favor of Saba, granting rescission and other relief, a decision upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Why It's Important?
The Supreme Court's decision in this case could have far-reaching implications for the investment industry, particularly concerning the rights of activist investors and the governance of investment companies. If the Court rules in favor of Saba, it could empower investors to challenge similar provisions in other funds, potentially leading to increased activism and changes in how investment companies structure their governance. This case also highlights the ongoing tension between investor rights and the protective measures funds implement to guard against hostile takeovers. The outcome could influence future legislative and regulatory approaches to investment company governance.
