What's Happening?
The Trump administration has announced plans to shut down the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colorado, a move that has sparked controversy and concern among climate scientists.
The decision, first reported by USA Today, involves dismantling NCAR's climate programs while maintaining its supercomputing and weather-related facilities. This action comes amid ongoing tensions between President Trump and Colorado Governor Jared Polis, particularly over the governor's refusal to release Tina Peters, a former election official convicted of breaching voting systems. The White House has implied that the closure is partly due to Polis's lack of cooperation with President Trump. NCAR, funded by the National Science Foundation, is a key institution in atmospheric science, providing research and tools to agencies like NOAA and NASA.
Why It's Important?
The closure of NCAR could have significant implications for climate research and weather modeling in the United States. NCAR is renowned for its contributions to atmospheric science, including innovations like dropsonde instruments used in hurricane tracking. The dismantling of its climate programs may hinder scientific progress and affect national security, as noted by former NOAA official Ryan Maue. The move also reflects broader political dynamics, with the Trump administration targeting institutions in Democrat-led states. The decision has drawn criticism from scientists and political leaders, who argue that it undermines scientific inquiry and could jeopardize critical research partnerships.
What's Next?
The scientific community, led by figures like Antonio Busalacchi, president of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, plans to engage Congress to oppose the administration's actions. Efforts are underway to coordinate a response from scientists and conference attendees, emphasizing the importance of preserving freedom of scientific thought. The relocation of NCAR's facilities and the continuation of weather research at new locations remain uncertain, with potential impacts on ongoing collaborations with agencies like NOAA.
Beyond the Headlines
The decision to close NCAR highlights the intersection of science and politics, raising concerns about the influence of political agendas on scientific institutions. The move could set a precedent for future actions against research centers perceived as politically misaligned. It also underscores the challenges faced by scientists in advocating for evidence-based policies amid political pressures. The broader implications for climate policy and research funding in the U.S. remain to be seen.
