Miami Coach Mario Cristobal Advocates for Heisman Trophy Timing Change to Post-CFP

What's Happening?

Miami head coach Mario Cristobal has publicly expressed his opinion that the Heisman Trophy should be awarded after the College Football Playoff (CFP) concludes, rather than before. Cristobal shared his views during an appearance on the Pardon My Take podcast, stating that awarding the trophy before postseason games is 'bizarre' and difficult for him to comprehend. Traditionally, the Heisman Trophy is announced in December following the conclusion of conference championship games. This year, the award ceremony is scheduled for December 15, just days before the CFP begins on December 19. Cristobal argues that playoff performances should be considered in the evaluation of candidates for the prestigious award. Miami's quarterback, Carson Beck, is currently a strong contender for the Heisman, having completed 73.4% of his passes for 1,213 yards and 11 touchdowns this season.

Why It's Important?

The timing of the Heisman Trophy presentation has implications for how players are evaluated and recognized for their performances. By awarding the trophy before the CFP, the current system may overlook significant contributions made during the playoffs, potentially affecting the perceived fairness and comprehensiveness of the award. Cristobal's suggestion could lead to a shift in how college football honors its top players, potentially influencing the prestige and criteria of the Heisman Trophy. This change could impact players, coaches, and teams, as postseason performances would gain more recognition, possibly altering strategies and motivations during the playoffs.

What's Next?

If Cristobal's proposal gains traction, it could lead to discussions among college football stakeholders about revising the timing of the Heisman Trophy presentation. This might involve negotiations with the NCAA, broadcasters, and sponsors to accommodate a new schedule. Coaches and players may also weigh in on the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a change. The debate could spark broader conversations about how awards are timed and presented in college sports, potentially influencing other accolades and recognitions.