What's Happening?
A new study published in the Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport has challenged traditional beliefs about rep ranges in strength training. The study compared two groups performing different rep ranges—10
reps and 20 reps per set—over six weeks, both working to concentric failure. The results showed comparable changes in muscle hypertrophy, strength, and energy efficiency between the groups, suggesting that the specific number of reps may be less important than previously thought. The key factor was working to failure, indicating that effort and intensity are more critical than the exact rep count.
Why It's Important?
This study has significant implications for fitness training, as it suggests that individuals can achieve similar muscle-building results regardless of the rep range, as long as they work to failure. This finding can simplify training programs and reduce the pressure on individuals to adhere to specific rep counts. It also highlights the importance of effort and intensity in workouts, encouraging people to focus on challenging themselves rather than strictly following traditional guidelines. This could lead to more personalized and flexible training approaches, benefiting both novice and experienced lifters.
