Trump Administration Ends De Minimis Exemption, Causing 80% Drop in US Postal Traffic

What's Happening?

The Trump administration has ended the de minimis exemption, a tariff exemption for low-cost imports, leading to a significant decline in postal traffic into the United States. The Universal Postal Union (UPU) reported that postal traffic has plunged by over 80% following the policy change. The de minimis exemption previously allowed parcels valued at $800 or less to enter the U.S. without customs charges. The new rules, effective from August 29, 2025, require transportation carriers or U.S. Customs and Border Protection-approved parties to collect and remit customs duties. This change has caused major operational disruptions, as many airlines and carriers are unwilling or unable to collect these duties. Consequently, 88 postal operators worldwide have suspended some or all postal services to the U.S. until a solution is found. The UPU is working on measures to help postal operators calculate and collect duties.

Why It's Important?

The elimination of the de minimis exemption has significant implications for international trade and the U.S. economy. By closing what the administration views as a loophole, the policy aims to prevent foreign businesses from evading tariffs and to curb illegal drug imports. However, the abrupt change has disrupted global postal services, affecting businesses and consumers who rely on low-cost imports. The policy could lead to increased costs for U.S. consumers and businesses, as they may now face higher prices for goods previously exempt from tariffs. Additionally, the suspension of postal services by numerous countries could strain international relations and impact global trade dynamics.

What's Next?

The UPU is actively developing new measures to assist postal operators in adapting to the new requirements. These measures aim to facilitate the calculation and collection of duties, potentially restoring some level of postal service to the U.S. However, the timeline for these solutions remains uncertain. The U.S. administration may face pressure from international partners and domestic stakeholders to address the operational challenges and economic impacts resulting from the policy change. Further discussions and negotiations may be necessary to find a balanced approach that addresses security concerns while minimizing disruptions to trade.

Beyond the Headlines

The policy change highlights the broader debate over trade protectionism and its impact on global supply chains. While the administration's move aims to protect domestic industries and enhance security, it also raises questions about the balance between national interests and global economic integration. The situation underscores the complexities of modern trade policies and the need for international cooperation to address shared challenges.