What's Happening?
President Donald Trump issued a pardon for former Puerto Rico Governor Wanda Vázquez Garced, but it did not encompass all the criminal cases she faced. The pardon specifically referenced the case United States v. Vazquez-Garced, et al., 3:22-CR-342, but omitted
a separate case filed under docket number 3:25-cr-00296, related to a misdemeanor charge of campaign finance violation to which Vázquez pleaded guilty in August 2025. The Trump administration believes the original pardon document is sufficient, but plans to issue an additional document to address the oversight. This situation highlights recurring issues with the clarity and scope of pardons issued by President Trump, as noted by former Justice Department pardon attorney Liz Oyer.
Why It's Important?
The oversight in the pardon could have significant legal implications, as it leaves the 2025 case against Vázquez Garced active despite the pardon. This situation underscores the complexities and potential pitfalls in the pardon process, particularly when normal protocols are not followed. The ambiguity in the scope of Trump's pardons has previously led to extensive litigation, as seen in other cases like the January 6 pardon proclamation. The need for clear and comprehensive documentation in the pardon process is critical to avoid unnecessary legal challenges and ensure the President's intent is accurately reflected.
What's Next?
The White House plans to issue an additional document to rectify the oversight in the pardon. Meanwhile, the 2025 case remains active, with a scheduled sentencing for Vázquez Garced on January 29. The defense has not yet filed a motion to close the cases based on the pardon. The situation may prompt further scrutiny of the pardon process and could lead to calls for reforms to ensure greater transparency and adherence to established protocols.
Beyond the Headlines
The case highlights broader issues of governance and the rule of law, particularly in how executive powers like pardons are exercised. The involvement of high-profile figures and significant political donations, such as those from Julio Herrera Velutini's daughter to a pro-Trump super PAC, adds layers of complexity and potential conflict of interest to the narrative. This situation may fuel ongoing debates about the influence of money in politics and the ethical considerations surrounding executive clemency.
