What's Happening?
The Chanakya Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution (CCADR) at CNLU Patna is inviting submissions for its ADR Blog 2025. The call is open to academicians, legal practitioners, research scholars, and students, encouraging them to submit original and unpublished manuscripts that advance the discourse on alternative dispute resolution. Submissions should be in .doc or .docx format and adhere to specific formatting guidelines, including a word count of 1200 to 1500 words, although longer submissions may be accepted at the discretion of the Review Board. Co-authorship is allowed for up to two authors, and submissions are accepted on a rolling basis.
Why It's Important?
This initiative by CCADR provides a platform for legal professionals and scholars to contribute to the evolving field of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). By encouraging well-researched and thought-provoking submissions, the blog aims to foster academic and practical discussions that can influence ADR practices and policies. This is significant for the legal community as ADR methods are increasingly being adopted to resolve disputes efficiently, reducing the burden on traditional court systems. The blog serves as a resource for sharing innovative ideas and developments in ADR, potentially impacting legal education and practice.
What's Next?
Authors interested in contributing to the ADR Blog 2025 can submit their manuscripts using the provided submission form. The peer-review system employed by the Blog Editors ensures that submissions are thoroughly evaluated, with contributors expected to incorporate suggested revisions. Upon acceptance, manuscripts may be returned to authors for further refinement before final publication. This ongoing process allows for continuous engagement and contribution to the field of ADR, with the potential for published works to influence future legal practices and policies.
Beyond the Headlines
The call for submissions highlights the importance of analytical over descriptive posts, emphasizing the need for quality, structure, logic, and writing style. This focus on analytical content suggests a shift towards more critical and evaluative discussions in the field of ADR, which could lead to more robust and effective dispute resolution strategies. Additionally, the requirement for authors to include brief biographical information underscores the importance of credibility and expertise in contributing to legal discourse.
