What is the story about?
What's Happening?
Recent discussions among botanists have revealed that the common metaphor of roses having thorns is scientifically inaccurate. According to experts, roses actually have prickles, which are superficial epidermal outgrowths, rather than thorns, which are modified stems. This revelation has implications for cultural references in music and literature, where the metaphor of roses and thorns is frequently used. The distinction was highlighted in a humorous context by Feedback, a column in New Scientist, which explored the impact of this botanical fact on various cultural works, including songs by Taylor Swift and poems by William Shakespeare.
Why It's Important?
The clarification about roses having prickles instead of thorns challenges long-standing cultural metaphors and could influence how these symbols are used in literature and music. This revelation underscores the importance of scientific accuracy in cultural expressions and may prompt a reevaluation of how natural elements are represented in art. The broader impact lies in the potential shift in educational approaches, where accurate botanical knowledge could replace traditional but incorrect metaphors, thereby fostering a more scientifically informed society.
AI Generated Content
Do you find this article useful?
