What's Happening?
A new national survey by the Marquette Law School Poll indicates a decline in the U.S. Supreme Court's approval rating, dropping to 43% in September from 47% in July. Disapproval concurrently rose to 57%.
This marks the second-lowest approval rating since January 2025. The poll, conducted from September 2-9, 2026, surveyed 1,023 adults nationwide. Partisan divides persist, with 71% of Republicans approving, 36% of independents, and 19% of Democrats. The perception that the Court often rules in favor of the Trump administration increased to 60% in September. A majority of adults, 54%, believe the Court is actively avoiding rulings that President Trump might disobey. Furthermore, 57% of respondents feel the justices' decisions are primarily motivated by politics rather than law. The survey also found strong public support for Supreme Court reforms, with 89% favoring a strict ethics code for justices, 79% supporting fixed terms, and 53% in favor of expanding the number of justices.
Why It's Important?
The declining approval rating of the U.S. Supreme Court, coupled with a widespread belief that its decisions are politically motivated, signals a potential crisis of public confidence in a crucial branch of government. This erosion of trust could undermine the Court's legitimacy and its ability to function effectively as an impartial arbiter of law. The strong bipartisan support for an ethics code (89%) and fixed terms for justices (79%) suggests a broad public desire for greater accountability and structural changes within the judiciary. The partisan split on expanding the Court (68% of Democrats and 56% of independents in favor, compared to 35% of Republicans) highlights a contentious area that could become a significant political battleground. These findings indicate a growing public demand for reforms that could fundamentally alter the composition and operational norms of the Supreme Court, impacting its future role in U.S. governance and legal interpretation.
What's Next?
The sustained public dissatisfaction and calls for reform could intensify pressure on Congress to consider legislative actions addressing the Supreme Court's structure and ethics. Lawmakers may introduce or advance bills related to judicial ethics, term limits, or even court expansion, reflecting the public's sentiment. The partisan divide on court expansion suggests that any such proposal would face significant political hurdles and likely become a central issue in future elections. The Court itself may face increased scrutiny and calls for internal reforms to address public perception of political bias. Future rulings, particularly those perceived as politically charged or impacting the Trump administration, will likely be met with heightened public and media attention, further influencing approval ratings and the ongoing debate about judicial independence and accountability.
Beyond the Headlines
The survey results point to a deeper societal concern regarding the politicization of institutions traditionally viewed as non-partisan. The perception that the Supreme Court's decisions are driven by politics rather than law could have long-term implications for the rule of law and democratic principles in the U.S. This trend might encourage a more activist approach from future administrations or Congress in attempting to shape the judiciary, potentially leading to a cycle of political interference. The widespread support for an ethics code also highlights a broader cultural expectation for transparency and integrity from public officials, including those in the highest judicial office. This could set a precedent for increased demands for ethical conduct across all branches of government, reflecting a shift in public expectations for institutional accountability.
