What's Happening?
An art historian has raised questions about the authenticity of Johannes Vermeer’s painting, 'The Art of Painting,' suggesting it may not be the work referenced in historical documents. The painting, created between 1666 and 1668, is currently housed in Vienna’s Kunsthistorisches Museum and is considered one of Vermeer’s masterpieces. Paul Taylor, a specialist in 17th-century Dutch art, argues that the term 'de schilderconst,' used in a 1676 legal document by Vermeer’s widow, Catharina, refers to allegories of painting rather than scenes of artists in their studios. Taylor’s research indicates that the document may refer to a different, now lost, painting. This challenges the long-held belief that the Vienna painting was the one Catharina attempted to keep after Vermeer’s death in 1675, amid financial difficulties.
Why It's Important?
The questioning of the authenticity of 'The Art of Painting' as the referenced work in historical documents could have significant implications for art historians and museums. If Taylor’s hypothesis is correct, it may lead to a reevaluation of Vermeer’s oeuvre and the historical understanding of his work. This could impact the valuation and exhibition strategies of museums holding Vermeer’s paintings, as well as influence scholarly research on Dutch art from the 17th century. The possibility of a lost Vermeer painting surfacing could also excite collectors and historians, potentially altering the landscape of art history and market dynamics.
What's Next?
Further research and investigation into Vermeer’s works and historical documents may be undertaken to verify Taylor’s claims. Museums and art historians might collaborate to explore the possibility of identifying the lost painting. The Kunsthistorisches Museum may also reassess its exhibition strategies for 'The Art of Painting,' considering its fragility and the new questions surrounding its authenticity. Additionally, the Rijksmuseum’s planned exhibition dedicated to Vermeer’s work may incorporate these findings, potentially influencing future exhibitions and scholarly discourse.
Beyond the Headlines
The debate over the authenticity of 'The Art of Painting' highlights broader issues in art history, such as the challenges of verifying historical documents and the interpretation of allegorical art. It underscores the importance of meticulous research and the evolving nature of art historical scholarship. This case also reflects the complexities of art ownership and the financial struggles faced by artists’ families, offering insights into the socio-economic conditions of the 17th century.
