What's Happening?
A recent study has evaluated the effectiveness of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), comparing individual (I-ESDM) and group (G-ESDM) settings. The study involved 404 children, divided into two groups, receiving three months of intervention. The I-ESDM group had a 1:1 staff-to-child ratio, while the G-ESDM group had a 2:6 ratio. Results showed significant improvements in clinical symptoms, neurodevelopment, and reduced parenting stress in both groups. However, the I-ESDM was more effective for children with a language age under two years, while the G-ESDM showed better outcomes for those with a language age of two years or older and a general quotient (GQ) of 70 or above.
Why It's Important?
This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different intervention models for children with ASD, which can inform treatment decisions and policy-making. Understanding the specific benefits of individual versus group settings can help tailor interventions to meet the diverse needs of children with ASD, potentially improving outcomes and resource allocation. The findings may influence educational and therapeutic practices, encouraging a more personalized approach to autism care that considers the child's developmental stage and abilities.
