What's Happening?
A recent study conducted by researchers from the UAE, Canada, Japan, and Taiwan has highlighted the vulnerabilities of subsea cables to geopolitical tensions. The study examined three cable systems: Unity/EAC Pacific (Japan–U.S.), Asia-America Gateway
(Guam–Hawaii), and Tata TGNTata Indicom (India–Singapore). It found that the risk to these cables increases during periods of geopolitical tension, particularly in the 'gray zone' between peace and overt conflict. During such times, adversaries may engage in sabotage to create uncertainty and frustration without triggering direct retaliation. The study also noted that territorial seas and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) are more vulnerable to sabotage than high seas due to their shallow waters and wide continental shelves. The researchers propose a six-point policy framework to enhance cable security, including scenario-based security postures and regional seas frameworks.
Why It's Important?
The security of subsea cables is crucial as they carry a significant portion of global internet and communication traffic. Disruptions to these cables can have widespread implications for international communications, economic activities, and national security. As geopolitical tensions rise, the potential for sabotage increases, posing a threat to the stability and reliability of global communication networks. The study's findings underscore the need for enhanced security measures and international cooperation to protect these critical infrastructures. The proposed policy framework aims to mitigate risks by prioritizing protection at the segment/system level and strengthening early warning systems for gray zone risks.
What's Next?
The study suggests that governments and private sector stakeholders should collaborate to implement the proposed policy framework. This includes conducting vulnerability assessments, developing regional seas frameworks, and ensuring national readiness through audits and codified public-private protocols. As geopolitical tensions continue to fluctuate, it is essential for countries to remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding their subsea cable infrastructures. Future developments may include increased investment in security technologies and international agreements to protect these vital communication links.
