What's Happening?
A woman from metro Atlanta paid $7,700 to Turnbull Law Group, a Chicago-based debt relief firm, only to find that $6,600 of her payments were used for fees rather than reducing her debt. The woman, who
remains unnamed, and her husband fell behind on credit card payments after relocating to Atlanta, which led her to seek help from the firm. The contract she signed required her to pay 28% of her total debt as fees, a structure that is not permitted under Georgia's Debt Adjustment Act, which caps fees at 7.5% of the negotiated monthly payment. However, Turnbull Law Group claims an exemption as a law firm. The woman has since canceled her contract and filed complaints with the Georgia Attorney General’s consumer protection division and other legal associations.
Why It's Important?
This case highlights potential legal loopholes in Georgia's debt relief regulations, particularly concerning law firms. The exemption for law firms under the Debt Adjustment Act allows them to charge higher fees, which can significantly impact consumers already struggling with debt. This situation underscores the importance of consumer awareness and the need for regulatory scrutiny to protect individuals from potentially exploitative practices. The broader issue of consumer debt is significant, as American household debt reached $18.59 trillion in 2025, exacerbated by high interest rates and inflation. The case also raises questions about the effectiveness and ethics of debt relief services, which may leave consumers in worse financial situations.
What's Next?
The Georgia Attorney General's office is currently investigating Turnbull Law Group, which could lead to legal action or regulatory changes. The outcome of this investigation may influence how debt relief services are regulated in Georgia and potentially other states. Consumers are advised to negotiate directly with creditors and utilize free services from organizations like the National Foundation for Credit Counseling. The case may prompt further scrutiny of debt relief practices and encourage legislative reviews to close loopholes that allow high fees under the guise of legal exemptions.
Beyond the Headlines
The case reflects broader ethical concerns about the debt relief industry, where firms may prioritize profit over consumer welfare. The legal exemption for law firms could be seen as a loophole that undermines consumer protection laws. This situation may lead to increased advocacy for more stringent regulations and transparency in the debt relief sector. Additionally, it highlights the need for consumer education on financial management and the risks associated with debt relief services.
