Jill Lepore Advocates for Easier Constitutional Amendments to Address Entrenched Issues

What's Happening?

Jill Lepore, a Harvard historian and law professor, argues in her book 'We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution' that the U.S. Constitution should be easier to amend. Lepore highlights historical attempts to amend the Constitution, such as the Equal Rights Amendment and the abolition of the electoral college, which were ultimately unsuccessful due to the stringent requirements of Article V. This article requires a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the states, a process that has proven difficult to navigate. Lepore suggests that the current amendment process has led to a reliance on the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution, rather than allowing for direct amendments by the people.

Why It's Important?

The difficulty in amending the Constitution has significant implications for U.S. governance and democracy. Lepore's argument suggests that the current system may hinder the country's ability to address deeply entrenched social and political issues. By making the amendment process more accessible, there could be a shift towards more democratic engagement and less reliance on judicial interpretation. This could potentially lead to more timely and relevant constitutional changes that reflect the evolving values and needs of American society.

What's Next?

While Lepore does not provide specific recommendations for changing the amendment process, her book raises important questions about the future of constitutional reform in the U.S. The debate over how to balance the need for stability with the need for adaptability in the Constitution is likely to continue. Policymakers, legal scholars, and the public may need to engage in discussions about potential reforms to ensure the Constitution remains a living document that can effectively address contemporary challenges.

Beyond the Headlines

Lepore's analysis also touches on the ethical and cultural dimensions of constitutional change. The historical context of past amendments and the challenges faced by marginalized groups in achieving constitutional recognition highlight the ongoing struggle for equality and representation. The book underscores the importance of viewing the Constitution as a tool for progress and inclusivity, rather than a static document.