Firstpost    •    9 min read

‘Don’t confuse Engineering with statistical reconstruction’: Tech leaders rebut Zoho founder’s AI-driven career warning

WHAT'S THE STORY?

After Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei delivered one of the strongest warnings about AI replacing human jobs, Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu agreed to his stance urging the software workforce to start planning an alternate career. 

Vembu proved his view by taking to X and sharing the example of a simple app to explain what the speed of AI evolution is and how dangerous it can be for the present and future coders. 

“At this point, it is best for those of us who depend on writing code for a living to start considering alternative livelihoods. I include myself in this. I don’t say this in panic, but with calm acceptance and embrace,” Vembu wrote in a post that has since sparked widespread discussion in the tech community.

Premature comment 


Countering his viewpoint, Capgemini Director Raghu Kishore Vempati said Sridhar’s comment is too premature in saying coders should consider alternative livelihood because AI can code. 

In a post on X he wrote, “First of all, this isn’t Engineering at all. This is statistical reconstruction.”

Replying to this post Sridhar Vembu wrote on ‘X’ that “Anthropic has built an entire C compiler with their Claude AI. That is not an easy engineering feat at all. At this point, it is best for those of us who depend on writing code for a living to start considering alternative livelihoods. I include myself in this. I don’t say this in panic, but with calm acceptance and embrace.”



He added “As a matter of fact, I did a detailed session with Gemini Pro on how the economy will be shaped by the AI revolution. It was like having an extremely intelligent economic philosopher debating you. I asked it to critique its own work and it did a fantastic job too. As Gemini and I see this, the future could unfold in two ways, depending on who owns and collects rent on this technology.”

Confusion between Engineering and statistical reconstruction


Vempati countered Vembu’s comment and wrote that the remark was premature and asked to refuse confusion between Engineering and statistical reconstruction. 

He wrote, “Isn’t it too premature to say what you are saying?, To suggest that we should consider altenative livelihoods because an AI that can compile C code is stretching it too far. First of all, this isn’t Engineering at all. This is statistical reconstruction. Would be good if we don’t confuse the two.”



“Engineers are never paid to type syntax. They are paid to manage complexity, enforce security, and architect systems that survive reality. Your thinking is good, but if we were to return to soil and philosophy, we assume that there is an AI that is meticulously running functioning global supply chains, energy grids, and information networks” said Raghu Vempati.



The cookie-cutter jobs are always at stake, as the real-core Engineering is being disseminated among the tech minds. Vempati emphasised that AI is running functionality and polishing supply chains but the real minds stay within the jurisdiction of the align field. 

AD
More Stories You Might Enjoy