What's Happening?
AIG is facing potential penalties after a federal appeals court ruled that the insurer's delay in increasing a settlement offer could be deemed unfair. The case involves Paula Appleton, who sustained severe injuries in a 2015 car accident. Despite receiving estimates suggesting a jury could award Appleton $7.5 million, AIG maintained a $2.65 million offer for nearly a year. The First Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a lower court's summary judgment in favor of AIG, stating that a jury should decide if AIG's actions were fair. Appleton had initially demanded $18 million, and after a state trial, a jury awarded her $7.465 million. Appleton later sued AIG for unfair claims settlement practices under Massachusetts law.
AD
Why It's Important?
This ruling highlights the legal obligations of insurers to make prompt and fair settlement offers when liability is clear. The decision could impact how insurance companies handle claims, potentially leading to more timely settlements to avoid litigation. For claimants, this case underscores the importance of pursuing legal action if they believe an insurer is acting unfairly. The outcome could influence future court decisions and insurance practices, affecting both insurers and policyholders across the U.S.
What's Next?
The case will return to a lower court where a jury will determine if AIG's settlement offer was reasonable. This decision could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled, potentially leading to changes in insurance industry practices. Insurers may need to reassess their claims handling procedures to ensure compliance with legal standards, while claimants may feel empowered to challenge perceived unfair practices.
